le récitant : calmer ce sentiment.
Torpeur
un peu de tort / beaucoup de peur
Une — — Torpille
dans mon flanc
et je pile \
I
I
I
I
I
mon dernier souvenir de mouvement c’est un rire
go ?
—
— On peut définir la marche comme l’action de se
déplacer vers un but, dans le plan antéro-postérieur,
par l’intermédiaire d’une succession d’appuis sur un
et deux pieds.
Au cours de la marche, le sujet est en position
permanente de déséquilibre, au sens mécanique
du terme, déséquilibre maximum à la fin de la
période d’appui sur un pied. —
C’est vrai que dit comme ça c’est rassurant
ça a pas l’air d’être si compliqué,
non ?
Queria muito ter todos os trade paperback dos invisibles(s?o sete ao todo), mas infelizmente na importadora cada um custa 105 reais. So quando eu trabalhar e ganhar uma grana boa portanto…. Enquanto isso vou me virando com a vers?o em português que ate agora esta s? no n?mero 10, e tende a ser interrompida no meio apesar da grandess?ssima boa-vontade dos editores, que se preocupam em trazer para o Brasil esses quadrinhos t?o bem escritos…
J’ai la douce impression
Que tout le monde prend pour soi (…)
Cyber-people-world ego-concentration
mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi-mOi
Game Over Mister’player
Play again as a blOgger
 |
– To juz slyszalem w ?Hamlecie” Szekspira. Caly ten proces to jeden wielki spektakl odbywajacy sie w grafomanskiej, pelnej potkniec jezykowych wyobrazni uczniaka ze szkoly sredniej. Uczniaka z aspiracjami, który wzbija sie wychodzac poza skostniala forme rozprawki, tworzac rzeczywistosc, w której zanurza surowe tezy i antytezy, latwe do wyluskania przy odpowiednim wysilku. Stroi je w piekne piórka. Na dodatek ma odwage, wkladajac te slowa w moje usta, sprzeciwic sie umieszczeniu go w ciasnej formie wypracowania. Wie, ze pisze o sprawie oczywistej, z góry skazujac podsadnego. Na bialych kartach papieru jawi sie napis: winny! Z przekory móglby bronic Raskolnikowa, lecz kazdy normalny czlowiek od razu potepi morderce. Nie mozna kogos zabic, poprawic sie – nawet na skutek glebokiej przemiany wewnetrznej i dostac jeszcze nagrode w postaci ulaskawienia. Powiecie, ze zachodzi koincydencja wplywu wewnetrznego i zewnetrznego, tych dwóch scierajacych sie ze soba sil.
|
— — — — —
— — — — —
Perdu dans le jus du monde
— — — — —
saumâtre
amer
comme un baiser d’adieu
d’une mère à son fils
mais la feuille de route précise : impossible de reculer
— — — — —
Un gros tigre
me barre le passage
il est étrange
de près
ses yeux sont bleus
et ces rayures sont faites de lignes
dans lesquelles on distingue des phrases
comme
— ton champ des possibles est en flammes —
ou bien
— la route se rétrécit —
je n’aime pas du tout la façon
dont il me regarde
avec ses yeux en spirales
—
j’attends un éclair
Being blOg
Thinking blOg
Waking up blOg
Playing game blOg
Artistic working blOg
Et puis quoi encore ! (…)
|
Le
jour viendra où le tableau ne suffira plus. Les couleurs en se multipliant n’auront absolument pas besoin de formes pour être perçues et comprises. Nous nous passerons de toiles et de pinceaux ; nous offrirons au monde – au lieu de tableaux – de géantes peintures éphémères formées par des falots brasillant, des réflecteurs électriques et des gaz polychromes, qui, en harmonisant leurs gerbes, leurs spirales et leurs réseaux, rempliront d’enthousiasme l’âme complexe des foules futures. |
La maladie reprenait progressivement le dessus
ses geoliers lui ayant formellement interdit de chanter
If space and imaginary time are indeed like the surface of the Earth, there wouldn’t be any singularities in the imaginary time direction, at which the laws of physics would break down. And there wouldn’t be any boundaries, to the imaginary time space-time, just as there aren’t any boundaries to the surface of the Earth. This absence of boundaries means that the laws of physics would determine the state of the universe uniquely, in imaginary time. But if one knows the state of the universe in imaginary time, one can calculate the state of the universe in real time. One would still expect some sort of Big Bang singularity in real time. So real time would still have a beginning. But one wouldn’t have to appeal to something outside the universe, to determine how the universe began. Instead, the way the universe started out at the Big Bang would be determined by the state of the universe in imaginary time. Thus, the universe would be a completely self-contained system. It would not be determined by anything outside the physical universe, that we observe.
 |
Other scientists were much more ready than Einstein to modify the classical 19th century view of determinism. A new theory, called quantum mechanics, was put forward by Heisenberg, the Austrian, Erwin Schroedinger, and the British physicist, Paul Dirac. Dirac was my predecessor but one, as the Lucasian Professor in Cambridge. Although quantum mechanics has been around for nearly 70 years, it is still not generally understood or appreciated, even by those that use it to do calculations. Yet it should concern us all, because it is a completely different picture of the physical universe, and of reality itself. In quantum mechanics, particles don’t have well defined positions and speeds. Instead, they are represented by what is called a wave function.
 This is a number at each point of space. The size of the wave function gives the probability that the particle will be found in that position. The rate, at which the wave function varies from point to point, gives the speed of the particle. One can have a wave function that is very strongly peaked in a small region. This will mean that the uncertainty in the position is small. But the wave function will vary very rapidly near the peak, up on one side, and down on the other. Thus the uncertainty in the speed will be large. Similarly, one can have wave functions where the uncertainty in the speed is small, but the uncertainty in the position is large. |
So three dimensions, seems to be the minimum for life. But just as one can think of two dimensional beings living on the surface of the Earth, so one could imagine that the three dimensional space in which we live, was the surface of a sphere, in another dimension that we don’t see. If the sphere were very large, space would be nearly flat, and Euclidean geometry would be a very good approximation over small distances. But we would notice that Euclidean geometry broke down, over large distances. As an illustration of this, imagine a team of painters, adding paint to the surface of a large ball. As the thickness of the paint layer increased, the surface area would go up. If the ball were in a flat three-dimensional space, one could go on adding paint indefinitely, and the ball would get bigger and bigger. However, if the three-dimensional space, were really the surface of a sphere in another dimension, its volume would be large but finite. As one added more layers of paint, the ball would eventually fill half the space. After that, the painters would find that they were trapped in a region of ever decreasing size, and almost the whole of space, was occupied by the ball, and its layers of paint. So they would know that they were living in a curved space, and not a flat one. This example shows that one can not deduce the geometry of the world from first principles, as the ancient Greeks thought. Instead, one has to measure the space we live in, and find out its geometry by experiment. However, although a way to describe curved spaces, was developed by the German, George Friedrich Riemann, in 1854, it remained just a piece of mathematics for sixty years. It could describe curved spaces that existed in the abstract, but there seemed no reason why the physical space we lived in, should be curved. This came only in 1915, when Einstein put forward the General Theory of Relativity.
|
